Asia-Pacific Network logo

Inter Press Service: 3 January 2000

BOUGAINVILLE: NEW PAPERS REVEAL AUSTRALIAN ROLE IN USE OF FORCE

Australia's role in the already shaky peace process for the Bougainville conflict in Papua New Guinea is likely to come under further challenge from independence supporters, following new revelations found in previously secret Australian government documents. They reveal that Canberra considered the use of military force to overcome landowner opposition to the development of the Bougainville copper mine

By BOB BURTON in Canberra


AUSTRALIA'S role in the already shaky peace process for the Bougainville conflict in Papua New Guinea is likely to come under further challenge from independence supporters, following new revelations found in previously secret Australian government documents.

These documents reveal that Canberra considered the use of military force to overcome landowner opposition to the development of the Bougainville copper mine -- the source of restiveness that later became a full-blown rebellion that has yet to be fully settled today after 11 years.

The previously secret 1969 Cabinet submissions were released to the public on on the first day of the year by the Australian Archives Office.

They reveal that even prior to the construction of the Panguna copper mine in Bougainville island, the Australian Government knew of the mounting landowner opposition to the project and discussed the possible need to use military force to ensure it proceeded.

Prior to its independence in 1975, Papua New Guinea was administered by Australia.

Con Zinc Rio Tinto (CRA), an Australian mining company, was pushing to develop the massive copper deposit that became the Panguna mine.

A 1969 intelligence committee report, appended to one of the Cabinet submissions, reveals that officials ridiculed mine opponents as ''collaborators with the Japanese'' during World War II, dismissed as ''suspect'' the motives of a member of Papua New Guinea's Parliament leading concerned landowners and argued that he was ''probably motivated by self interest''.

In a submission to Cabinet in April 1969, the Minister for External Territories, C.E. Barnes infomed his Cabinet colleagues of opposition to the mine proposal before the project had even been established.

Barnes said that ''until CRA has entered into occupation of the land that it requires, difficulties with the native people, including in some areas opposition to the acquisition of land or pressure for secession, may be expected''.

''If the CRA project is allowed to falter the government's policy for the economic, social and political development. . .will be placed in jeopardy,'' he warned. Worse still, Barnes said, the Australian Administration could also ''be liable to pay substantial damages to CRA'' if the project did not proceed.

Barnes discounted the prospect of a secessionist movement emerging as ''unlikely'' but conceded that there was ''a possibility of passive or active resistance to the occupation of land in conjunction with the CRA project''.

Barnes urged his Cabinet colleagues to consider the ''deployment of elements of the Pacific Islands Regiment (PIR)''. Barnes noted that Cabinet had already given its approval for ''planning to be put in hand for the provision of military assistance as a last resort''.

The Cabinet was less enthusiastic than Barnes, referring his proposal to an Inter-Departmental committee.

In a separate submission in August 1969, Barnes supported a proposal from CRA that they be allowed to use up to 1,600 Asian workers for the construction of the project.

''It is suggested that workers indentured from Asian countries are more amenable to control and discipline and would be less likely to cause serious social problems on Bougainville than large numbers of Australian or European construction workers,'' he wrote.

The mine, which became many times larger than discussed in negotiations with landowners at the outset, obliterated extensive areas of villagers' gardens and poisoned the river with mine wastes.

The environmental damage and social dislocation caused by the mine catalysed a civil war from 1988 to 1997 between independence-minded Bougainvilleans and the government of Papua New Guinea that was determined to maintain national unity at all costs.

The civil war cost more than 10,000 lives, many of the casualties resulting from a PNG Government blockade that prevented medical supplies from reaching the island.

After the collapse of PNG government and attempts to employ mercenaries to wipe the Bougainville Revolutionary Army (BRA) and re-open the mine, a truce was negotiated.

Since December 1997, 250 unarmed troops and civilians from Australia, Fiji, New Zealand and Vanuatu have monitored the truce and commenced civil reconstruction talks.

In late November, the peace process received a setback when the PNG Supreme Court overturned a decision by the PNG Parliament to establish the Bougainville Reconciliation Government (BRG), which included former leaders of the secessionist BRA.

The decision ordered the restoration of the provincial government that has been rejected by Bougainville community leaders.

After the court ruling, the leader of the BRA, Francis Ona, withdrew from the disarmament process and warned the PNG Government that it was willing to take up arms again unless the people of Bougainville are given the option of voting at a referendum on whether they want independence.

''These so-called reconciliation talks are being manipulated by the PNG and Australian Governments to protect their own economies,'' Ona told an Australian journalist. ''Without proper independence, exploitation, destruction and social problems will return. Mining will return and that will not bring peace but only bring war.''

Australian Defence Minister John Moore, addressing Australian troops in Bougainville just before Christmas, put pressure on the PNG government for a quick resolution of the protracted Bougainville crisis.

He suggested that he wants to withdraw the Australian unarmed peace monitoring contingent by the end of 2000. ''The boys in Bougainville, they're committed there until April next year. We hope, certainly I hope that we can get them out of there by the end of next year,'' he said. (END/IPS/ap-hd-ip/bb/js/00)

Copyright © 2000 Inter Press Sevice and Asia-Pacific Network. This document is for educational and research use. Please seek permission for publication.
http://www.asiapac.org.fj/cafepacific/resources/aspac/boug2.html


Return to Asia-Pacific Network index