WAR ON TERRORISM
THE EMPIRE STRIKES FIRST

President Bush has tried to sell skittish Americans on a war with Iraq by alluding to the possibility of a link between Saddam and Al Qaeda. The axis of evil has shrunk to Saddam, evil incarnate. Iran and North Korea were put aside with the dismissive comment: "Different threats require different strategies."

By MAUREEN DOWD, of The New York Times, in Washington

Feedback to the Toktok page

Via greenleaf@pl.net 30/01/03 2:58:48 >>>
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/29/opinion/29DOWD.html?todaysheadlines

© The New York Times
29 January 2003

THERE was no smoking gun last night. There was merely a smoky allusion.

President Bush tried to sell skittish Americans on a war with Iraq by alluding to the possibility of a link between Saddam and Al Qaeda.

Outlaw regimes seeking bad weapons, Mr. Bush said, "could also give or sell those weapons to terrorist allies, who would use them without the least hesitation."

The axis of evil has shrunk to Saddam, evil incarnate. Iran and North Korea were put aside with the dismissive comment: "Different threats require different strategies."

The state of the union is skeptical.

At a moment when Americans were hungry for reassurance that the monomaniacal focus on Iraq makes sense when the economy is sputtering, Mr. Bush offered a rousing closing argument for war, but no convincing bill of particulars.

Republican senators tried to back up the President. While admitting that
there was no evidence that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction yet, John
Warner told reporters that an attack was justified "if you put together all
the bits and pieces that are out there right now."

Americans will never understand the Bush rationale for war if they simply
look at the bits and pieces of physical evidence.

They will understand the Bush rationale for war only if they look at the
metaphysical evidence, the perfect storm of imperial schemes and ideological
stratagems driving the desire to topple Saddam.

The Bush team thinks the way to galvanize the public is with fear, by
coupling Saddam to 9/11 and building him up into a Hitler who could threaten
the world, as the White House chief of staff, Andy Card, told Tim Russert
last Sunday, "with a holocaust."

But their reasons for war predate 9/11. The conservatives have wanted
Saddam's head for a dozen years.

Dick Cheney; his chief of staff, Scooter Libby; and the Pentagon official
Paul Wolfowitz also think Saddam is the perfect lab rat on which to test
their new pre-emptive "empire strikes first" national security strategy,
which Mr. Wolfowitz and Mr. Libby first drafted back in 1992, during the
Bush 41 administration, when Mr. Cheney was defense secretary.

The first President Bush found the ideas too far out. But now his son has
put them into play. Bush 43, former prep school football yell leader, is
reputed to be the author of the phrase in the new national security strategy
that sums up the policy: "We recognize that our best defense is a good
offense." (Didn't Sunday's Super Bowl prove that the best defense is a good
defense?)

After removing the super-rat, Mr. Wolfowitz, Mr. Libby and their fellow hawk
Richard Perle can turn his country into a laboratory for democracy in the
Arab world — creating a domino effect to give Israel more security. Once
they have planted Athenian democracy on Mesopotamian soil, they envision
orchestrating more freedom throughout the Middle East — as long as the
region plays ball with the new sheriff. They'll put pressure on Syria and
Iran to abandon their support for terrorism. And then, with an American
spigot, the oil will flow free — except to the French, who will pay dearly.

Mr. Rumsfeld sees a war with Iraq as a chance to exorcise American
ambivalence about the use of force left over from Vietnam, and the "pinprick
bombings" of the Clinton years. And Mr. Cheney sees it as an opportunity to
exorcise all the ghosts of the 60's and the feel-good Clinton era — the loss
of moral authority and the feeling that America is in decline or in the
wrong.

The vice president jumped up last night to cheer brawny unilateralism when
Mr. Bush said: "The course of this nation does not depend on the decisions
of others."

Despite its fixation on Saddam, the administration hasn't completely
forgotten about Osama. The Economist ran an ad this week that said: "For
over 100 years Arab-Americans have served the nation. Today we need you more
than ever. . . . For additional information and to apply online, please
visit our website at www.cia.gov." <http://www.cia.gov./>

The C.I.A. is seeking Arabic-speaking agents.

Now they get around to that?

MAUREEN DOWD is a staff correspondent of The New York Times.